About the Journal

Erudite Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Sciences (EJETMS) is an evolving, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access online journal with a total of 4 issues per year. EJETMS welcomes review articles, research articles, technical reports, scientific reports, case studies and basic advances reports in engineering management studies, life sciences, commerce, humanities, development research, cultural research, archaeological research, arts and sciences etc. The scope covers modeling, design, analysis, and implementation in all aspects of research. EJETMS aims to create a new forum for the exchange of ideas and information for professionals, engineers, students, researchers, academics and practitioners who share their knowledge across all aspects of research from all around the world. We provide quality editing, reviewing, and support by professionally talented editorial board members and reviewers. The driving force of EJETMS is to accelerate the dissemination of knowledge by publishing high-quality research work and massively revolutionizing the dominance of open journals and online publications.

Peer-Review Process

Manuscripts in Erudite Journal of Engineering Technology and Management Sciences (EJETMS) are subject to peer review process.

Initial Checks

  • All the submitted manuscripts will be checked by an experienced editor to determine whether the submitted manuscript is properly prepared and whether they follow the ethical policies of the journal and contain all the necessary disclosures.
  • All the submitted manuscripts will be checked for the correctness of the references. The incomplete, inappropriate, or vague/misleading references may lead to desk rejection.
  • All the submitted articles will be checked for the English language at this stage and authors may be asked for language editing by any native or professional English language editor.
  • The submitted articles will be screened for plagiarism.
  • Manuscripts that are not properly prepared will be returned to the authors for revision and resubmission.
  • Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message, or if not prepared as per journals instructions are rejected without a formal peer-review.

Peer-Review

The manuscript that passes the initial check/desk review, is subjected to double-blinded peer-review. The manuscript will be reviewed by a minimum of two suitable experts (whose identities will remain anonymous to the authors) in the respective subject area.

Editorial Decision and Revision

The reports of all the reviewers will be considered while making the decision on a submitted manuscript. Editor-In-Chief will make the final decision, based on the reviewer’s comments. The journal may consult the different experts and editor(s) in order to reach an appropriate decision.

Authors are required to respond to all the reviewers and submit the point-wise clarification for the comments of the reviewers and handling editor. Authors must provide a clear response in their rebuttal letter wherever they disagree with a reviewer or editor.